Effect of test duration and sensor location on the reliability of standing balance parameters derived using body-mounted accelerometers.

BACKGROUND: Balance parameters derived from wearable sensor measurements during postural sway have been shown to be sensitive to experimental variables such as test duration, sensor number, and sensor location that influence the magnitude and frequency-related properties of measured center-of-mass (COM) and center-of-pressure (COP) excursions. In this study, we investigated the effects of test duration, the number of sensors, and sensor location on the reliability of standing balance parameters derived using body-mounted accelerometers. METHODS: Twelve volunteers without any prior history of balance disorders were enrolled in the study. They were asked to perform two 2-min quiet standing tests with two different testing conditions (eyes open and eyes closed). Five inertial measurement units (IMUs) were employed to capture postural sway data from each participant. IMUs were attached to the participants' right legs, the second sacral vertebra, sternum, and the left mastoid processes. Balance parameters of interest were calculated for the single head, sternum, and sacrum accelerometers, as well as, a three-sensor combination (leg, sacrum, and sternum). Accelerometer data were used to estimate COP-based and COM-based balance parameters during quiet standing. To examine the effect of test duration and sensor location, each 120-s recording from different sensor locations was segmented into 20-, 30-, 40-, 50-, 60-, 70-, 80-, 90-, 100-, and 110-s intervals. For each of these time intervals, time- and frequency-domain balance parameters were calculated for all sensor locations. RESULTS: Most COM-based and COP-based balance parameters could be derived reliably for clinical applications (Intraclass-Correlation Coefficient, ICC ≥ 0.90) with a minimum test duration of 70 and 110 s, respectively. The exceptions were COP-based parameters obtained using a sacrum-mounted sensor, especially in the eyes-closed condition, which could not be reliably used for clinical applications even with a 120-s test duration. CONCLUSIONS: Most standing balance parameters can be reliably measured using a single head- or sternum-mounted sensor within a 120-s test duration. For other sensor locations, the minimum test duration may be longer and may depend on the specific test conditions.

Investigating the effects of conventional thermoplastic ankle-foot and the neoprene ankle-foot orthoses on the kinetics and kinematics of gait in people with foot drop following traumatic injury of the peroneal nerve: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Adopting compensatory walking mechanisms by people with foot drop due to traumatic injury of the peroneal nerve costs altered gait kinetics and kinematics. Therefore, orthoses are generally recommended to minimize the deployment of compensatory gait mechanisms. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the immediate effects of a low-cost, Neoprene Ankle-Foot Orthosis (NAFO) and the thermoplastic ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) with the shoe-only condition on kinematics and kinetics of gait of people with foot drop following peroneal nerve traumatic injury. METHODS: Seven people with foot drop due to traumatic injury of the peroneal nerve were included in this study. The gait kinematics and kinetics of the participants were investigated in three different conditions: shoe-only, AFO + shoe, and NAFO + shoe using a six-camera, motion-analysis system, and a force platform. A Friedman two-way ANOVA by ranks model was employed to compare different testing conditions. RESULTS: The ankle angle at the initial contact was significantly different between shoe-only condition and AFO (p < 0.00). The plantarflexion angle in both orthotic designs was reduced significantly compared to the shoe-only condition (p < 0.00). The maximum ankle dorsiflexion angle during the stance phase and maximum knee flexion angle during the stance and swing phases were not statistically significant for all testing conditions (p > 0.00). A significant difference was observed for the 1st-rise of the ground reaction force's vertical component between the NAFO and the AFO (p < 0.00). Likewise, a significant difference was observed for the 2nd-rise of the ground reaction force's vertical component between the NAFB and the AFO (p < 0.00). CONCLUSION: Both orthotic interventions could control the ankle-foot complex during the gait and reduce the employment of compensatory gait mechanisms.

Use of machine learning to select texture features in investigating the effects of axial loading on T2-maps from magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar discs.

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in texture analysis and machine learning offer new opportunities to improve the application of imaging to intervertebral disc biomechanics. This study employed texture analysis and machine learning on MRIs to investigate the lumbar disc's response to loading. METHODS: Thirty-five volunteers (30 (SD 11) yrs.) with and without chronic back pain spent 20 min lying in a relaxed unloaded supine position, followed by 20 min loaded in compression, and then 20 min with traction applied. T2-weighted MR images were acquired during the last 5 min of each loading condition. Custom image analysis software was used to segment discs from adjacent tissues semi-automatically and segment each disc into the nucleus, anterior and posterior annulus automatically. A grey-level, co-occurrence matrix with one to four pixels offset in four directions (0°, 45°, 90° and 135°) was then constructed (320 feature/tissue). The Random Forest Algorithm was used to select the most promising classifiers. Linear mixed-effect models and Cohen's d compared loading conditions. FINDINGS: All statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) were observed in the nucleus and posterior annulus in the 135° offset direction at the L4-5 level between lumbar compression and traction. Correlation (P2-Offset, P4-Offset) and information measure of correlation 1 (P3-Offset, P4-Offset) detected significant changes in the nucleus. Statistically significant changes were also observed for homogeneity (P2-Offset, P3-Offset), contrast (P2-Offset), and difference variance (P4-Offset) of the posterior annulus. INTERPRETATION: MRI textural features may have the potential of identifying the disc's response to loading, particularly in the nucleus and posterior annulus, which appear most sensitive to loading. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Investigating the validity of a single tri-axial accelerometer mounted on the head for monitoring the activities of daily living and the timed-up and go test.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative assessments of activities of daily living (ADL) play an essential role in evaluating the impact of disease and interventions on people's quality of life. Motion capture systems traditionally used for quantitative assessments of postural transitions and movement associated with ADL are limited to the laboratory setting. Wearable accelerometers can remove these limitations and enable easier-to-use, longer-term, and remote functional evaluations. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of a single tri-axial accelerometer mounted on the head for monitoring postural transition and the timed-up-and-go test. METHODS: Two accelerometers with a sampling frequency of 100 Hz were attached to twelve able-bodied study participants' sternum and right mastoid process. We developed algorithms for the functional calibration of accelerometers and the detection of the postural transitions by measuring the head inclination angle and variations of the gravitational components of the accelerometer readout. Participants performed a battery of ADL tests involving a wide variety of postural transitions. The head-mounted accelerometers results were compared with a sternum-mounted accelerometer and validated against a video motion capture system as a gold standard reference. RESULTS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The results indicate that, utilizing our proposed algorithm, a single tri-axial accelerometer mounted on the head can deliver high accuracy (>95 %), sensitivity (>90 %), and specificity (100 %) for detecting both postural transitions and walking events. Together with the small size and unobtrusive placement of the head-mounted accelerometer, these results demonstrate an attractive solution for the reliable assessment of ADLs and clinical evaluations based on functional tests such as the timed-up-and-go test.

Timing and dosage of FES cycling early after acute spinal cord injury: A case series report.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the progression in parameters of functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling dosage (including duration, velocity, stimulation amplitudes, power output), and the resulting changes in muscle mass early after acute spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Three participants, 24-38 years old, with neurological injury level C4-T4, severity AIS (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale) A-C, started FES cycling 16-20 days post injury while admitted at a level-1 trauma center in Canada, and continued for 8-13 weeks in a rehabilitation hospital. They performed three sessions/week of 15-45 min FES cycling, supine or sitting. FES parameters, cycling performance, and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) in thighs and calves were measured every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Progression in power output, but not in session duration, was limited in two participants who experienced stimulation-associated referred pain or apprehension, requiring limitation of stimulation amplitudes for up to 65 days after the start of FES cycling. Participants started with 15 min cycling at 20 RPM with no resistance (0 W), and progressed to 30-45 min at 30 RPM producing 8.8-19.0 W average power/session after 2-3 months. Initially, muscle CSA decreased in all 3 participants (up to 16% after 6 weeks), and recovered later after a variable period of FES cycling (up to 16% at 13.3 weeks). CONCLUSION: Progression of FES cycling in the first 3 months after injury required a highly individualized approach, guided by participant response, rather than standardized increments in stimulation intensity or duration. Changes in muscle CSA did not always correspond with the dose of FES cycling.

Immediate effect of prefabricated and UCBL foot orthoses on alignment of midfoot and forefoot in young people with symptomatic flexible flatfoot: A radiographic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Radiographic imaging has been considered the gold standard in evaluating the skeletal alignment of the foot in static weightbearing. The effects of foot orthoses on the alignment of foot bones have been mostly evaluated using lateral view x-rays. The posterior-anterior view has not been investigated extensively. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of 2 foot orthoses: University of California Biomechanics Laboratory Orthosis (UCBL) and a prefabricated orthosis (P-FFO) on the alignment of foot bones on anterior-posterior x-rays in young people with symptomatic flexible flatfoot (SFF). STUDY DESIGN: This is a randomized, crossover study. METHODS: Fifteen participants (mean [SD], 23.67 ± 2 years) with SFF were randomly imaged in 3 different conditions: shoes only, shoes + P-FFO, and shoes + UCBL. The talonavicular coverage, the first and the second talometatarsal angles, the intermetatarsal angle, and the cuboid abduction angle (CAA) were measured on weightbearing, anterior-posterior x-ray images for each condition. RESULTS: Both orthotic designs demonstrated a significant reduction in the talonavicular coverage, the first and the second talometatarsal angles, and the CAA compared with the shoe-only condition (P < .001). The talonavicular coverage angle reduced by ∼11% using P-FFO compared with UCBL (P < .005). No significant differences were observed for other angles between the 2 orthotic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Both orthotic conditions improved the talonavicular coverage, first and the second talometatarsal angle, and CAA in young people with SFF. The walls of the UCBL orthosis did not result in further correction of the talonavicular coverage angle compared with the prefabricated FFO design.

The effects of axial loading on the morphometric and T2 characteristics of lumbar discs in relation to disc degeneration.

BACKGROUND: Intervertebral disc degeneration affects the morphology, biomechanics and biochemistry of the disc. The study aimed to compare the effects of compression and traction on lumbar discs measurements in relation to degeneration. METHODS: Thirty-five volunteers (30 (SD 11) yrs.) with and without chronic back pain rested supine 15 min before an unloaded T2-mapping MRI, were then loaded 20 min with 50% body weight with imaging during the last 5 min, and then repeated this process under traction. For lumbar discs, height, angle, width, mean-T2, and T2-weighted centroid locations were calculated. A repeated measure ANCOVA and Cohen's d compared loading conditions. Relations between measurement changes between conditions and degeneration assessed by Pfirrmann ratings were examined graphically. FINDINGS: From compression to traction, we observed significant: decrease in L1-2 mean-T2 (Effect size = -0.35); inferior and posterior shift in L4-5 (0.4, 0.14) and L5-S1 (0.25, 0.33) T2-weighted centroid. From unloaded to compression, we observed a significant: increase in L5-S1 width (Effect Size = 0.22); anterior shift in L1-2 T2-weighted centroid (0.39); and L3-4 (mean 2.1°) and L4-5 (1.8°) extension angle. More degeneration was graphically related with larger changes from Compression to Traction (more superior and, anterior position of the T2-weighted centroid, increased height, reduced extension of segmental angle) and from Unloaded to Compression larger changes in inferior displacement of the T2-weighted centroid, decrease in height) but less anterior displacement of the centroid and less change in segmental angles. INTERPRETATION: The largest loading responses were at lower levels, generally with more degeneration. T2-weighted centroid locations, angle and disc height detected the largest loading response.

Texture analysis in the classification of T2 -weighted magnetic resonance images in persons with and without low back pain.

Magnetic resonance imaging findings often do not distinguish between people with and without low back pain (LBP). However, there are still a large number of people who undergo magnetic resonance imaging to help determine the etiology of their back pain. Texture analysis shows promise for the classification of tissues that look similar, and machine learning can minimize the number of comparisons. This study aimed to determine if texture features from lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging differ between people with and without LBP. In total, 14 participants with chronic LBP were matched for age, weight, and gender with 14 healthy volunteers. A custom texture analysis software was used to construct a gray-level co-occurrence matrix with one to four pixels offset in 0° direction for the disc and superior and inferior endplate regions. The Random Forests Algorithm was used to select the most promising classifiers. The linear mixed-effect model analysis was used to compare groups (pain vs. pain-free) at each level controlling for age. The Random Forest Algorithm recommended focusing on intervertebral discs and endplate zones at L4-5 and L5-S1. Differences were observed between groups for L5-S1 superior endplate contrast, homogeneity, and energy (p = .02). Differences were observed for L5-S1 disc contrast and homogeneity (p < .01), as well as for the inferior endplates contrast, homogeneity, and energy (p < .03). Magnetic resonance imaging textural features may have potential in identifying structures that may be the target of further investigations about the reasons for LBP.

Comparing the effectiveness of group-based exercise to other non-pharmacological interventions for chronic low back pain: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide with a substantial financial burden on individuals and health care systems. To address this, clinical practice guidelines often recommend non-pharmacological, non-invasive management approaches. One management approach that has been recommended and widely implemented for chronic LBP is group-based exercise programs, however, their clinical value compared with other non-pharmacological interventions has not been investigated systematically. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of group-based exercise with other non-pharmacological interventions in people with chronic LBP. METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched by two independent reviewers. Only randomized controlled trials that compared group-based exercise with other non-pharmacological interventions for chronic LBP were eligible. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of Interventions by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: Eleven studies were eligible. We identified strong evidence of no difference between group exercise and other non-pharmacologic interventions for disability level and pain scores 3-month post-intervention in people with chronic LBP. We could not find any strong or moderate evidence for or against the use of group-based exercise in the rehabilitation of people with chronic LBP for other time-points and health measurement outcomes. We found no statistically significant differences in disability and quality of life and pain between the group and individual non-pharmacological interventions that included exercise. CONCLUSION: With this equivocal finding, group-based exercise may be a preferred choice given potential advantages in other domains not reviewed here such as motivation and cost. Further research in this area is needed to evaluate this possibility.

Could compression and traction loading improve the ability of magnetic resonance imaging to identify findings related to low back pain?

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic imaging is routinely used to depict structural abnormalities in people with low back pain (LBP), but most findings are prevalent in people with and without LBP. It has been suggested that LBP is related to changes induced in the spine due to loading. Therefore, new imaging measurements are needed to improve our ability to identify structures relating to LBP. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the response of the lumbar spine to compression and traction in participants with and without chronic LBP using MRI T2-mapping. METHOD: Fifteen participants with chronic LBP were matched for age, weight, and gender with 15 healthy volunteers. All participants underwent MRI under three loading conditions maintained for 20 min each: resting supine, followed by compression and traction, both using 50% body weight. Participants were imaged in the last 5 min of each loading condition. Disc morphometric and fluid-based measurements from T2-maps were obtained. RESULTS: Traditional MRI measurements (i.e. disc height, width and mean signal intensity) were not able to capture any differences in the changes measured in response to loading between individuals with and without pain. The location of the T2 weighted centroid (WC) was able to capture the difference between groups in response to compression in the horizontal (p < 0.01) and vertical direction (p < 0.01), and in response to traction in the vertical direction (p < 0.01). While the location of T2WC moved anteriorly (Effect Size (ES): 0.44) and inferiorly with compression in those with pain (ES: 0.34), it moved posteriorly (ES: -0.14) and superiorly (ES: -0.05) in the group without pain. In response to traction, the vertical location of T2WC moved superiorly in both groups but the change was larger in those with pain (ES Pain = -0.52; ES No Pain: -0.13). CONCLUSION: The novel measurements of the location of the T2WC in the intervertebral discs were the only measurements capturing differences in response to loading between those with and without low back pain.

Reliability and validity of lumbar disc height quantification methods using magnetic resonance images.

Disc height has been a focus of research on disc degeneration and low back pain (LBP). However, choosing an appropriate method to quantify disc height remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to determine the reliability and construct validity of disc height quantification methods. Repeated semi-automatic measurements of L4-5 and L5-S1 discs were obtained from 43 T2-weighted mid-sagittal 3T magnetic resonance (MR) images of 22 subjects with LBP (43±13 years), blinded to prior measurements. Heights were calculated with area-based methods (using 60%, 80% and 100% of the disc width), and point-based methods (Hurxthal's, Dabbs' and combining the two). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were estimated. Construct validity was assessed using correlation coefficients. Intra-rater ICC(3,1) of the area-based disc height measurements ranged from 0.84 to 0.99 with an inter-rater ICC(2,1) of 0.99. Measurements with point-based methods had lower intra- and inter-rater reliability ranging between 0.76 and 0.96 and between 0.84 and 0.98, respectively. Inter-rater SEM varied between 0.2 and 0.3 mm for area-based methods and between 0.3 and 0.7 mm for point-based methods. Excluding Dabbs', high correlations (r>0.9) were observed between methods. Area-based height measurements using partial disc width demonstrated excellent reliability and construct validity and outperformed point-based methods.

MRI evaluation of the effects of extension exercises on the disc fluid content and location of the centroid of the fluid distribution.

BACKGROUND: McKenzie prone press-up exercises have been hypothesised to reduce intradiscal pressure, allowing fluid to be reabsorbed into the disc, which could improve the internal stability and local chemical milieu of the disc, potentially reducing symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the immediate effects of prone press-up exercises on lumbar disc fluid content and movement. DESIGN: Quantification of MRI changes before and after a single exercise session. METHODS: The mid-sagittal T2-weighted MR images of 22 volunteers with low back pain were obtained before and immediately after performing press-up exercises. The whole disc and nucleus regions of the L4-5 and L5-S1 discs were then segmented, and their mean signal intensity (MSI) and signal intensity weighted centroid (SIWC) were computed to estimate disc fluid content and displacement. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the MSI and the vertical position of the SIWC of the whole disc before and after extension at either disc level (effect size [ES]: -0.23 to 0.09). There was a significant anterior displacement (0.1 ± 5.4 mm) of the location of the SIWC of the disc after extension exercise at L4-5 (ES: 0.22), but not at L5-S1 (ES: 0.00) or at either level for the nucleus region (ES: -0.06; 0.16). CONCLUSION: Little evidence was found supporting the hypothesis that press-up exercises affect disc fluid content and distribution. Novel parameters reflecting fluid distribution detected similar or larger effects of the extension than MSI. If such exercises are effective in reducing symptoms, it is likely through other mechanisms than by changing fluid content or distribution.

Is the location of the signal intensity weighted centroid a reliable measurement of fluid displacement within the disc?

Degenerated discs have shorter T2-relaxation time and lower MR signal. The location of the signal-intensity-weighted-centroid reflects the water distribution within a region-of-interest (ROI). This study compared the reliability of the location of the signal-intensity-weighted-centroid to mean signal intensity and area measurements. L4-L5 and L5-S1 discs were measured on 43 mid-sagittal T2-weighted 3T MRI images in adults with back pain. One rater analysed images twice and another once, blinded to measurements. Discs were semi-automatically segmented into a whole disc, nucleus, anterior and posterior annulus. The coordinates of the signal-intensity-weighted-centroid for all regions demonstrated excellent intraclass-correlation-coefficients for intra- (0.99-1.00) and inter-rater reliability (0.97-1.00). The standard error of measurement for the Y-coordinates of the signal-intensity-weighted-centroid for all ROIs were 0 at both levels and 0 to 2.7 mm for X-coordinates. The mean signal intensity and area for the whole disc and nucleus presented excellent intra-rater reliability with intraclass-correlation-coefficients from 0.93 to 1.00, and 0.92 to 1.00 for inter-rater reliability. The mean signal intensity and area had lower reliability for annulus ROIs, with intra-rater intraclass-correlation-coefficient from 0.5 to 0.76 and inter-rater from 0.33 to 0.58. The location of the signal-intensity-weighted-centroid is a reliable biomarker for investigating the effects of disc interventions.

Comparing the immediate effects of UCBL and modified foot orthoses on postural sway in people with flexible flatfoot.

BACKGROUND: Different types of foot orthoses have been prescribed for patients with flatfoot. Results of several studies have shown that orthoses were able to change balance parameters in people with flatfoot. However, the possible effect of orthosis flexibility on balance has not yet been investigated. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the current study was to investigate the immediate effect of a rigid University of California Berkeley Laboratory (UCBL) foot orthosis, a modified foot orthosis, and a normal shoe on the postural sway of people with flexible flatfoot. STUDY DESIGN: Quasi-experimental. METHODS: In all, 20 young adults with flatfoot (aged 23.5 ± 2.8 years) were invited to participate in this study. The Biodex Stability System was employed to perform standing balance tests under three testing conditions, namely, shoe only, UCBL, and modified foot orthosis. Total, medial-lateral, and anterior-posterior sway were evaluated for each condition. RESULTS: The results of this study revealed no statistical difference in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior stability indices between foot orthoses and shoed conditions. The overall stability index with the UCBL foot orthosis, however, was significantly lower than that with the modified foot orthosis. CONCLUSION: The UCBL foot orthosis was able to decrease total sway and improve balance in people with flexible flatfoot. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results of previous studies have indicated that foot orthoses were able to affect the balance of people with flatfeet. However, the possible effects of flexible orthoses on balance have not been examined. The results of this study may provide new insight into material selection for those people with balance disorders.

The effects of a prophylactic knee brace and two neoprene knee sleeves on the performance of healthy athletes: a crossover randomized controlled trial.

Knee injury is one of the major problems in sports medicine, and the use of prophylactic knee braces is an attempt to reduce the occurrence and/or severity of injuries to the knee joint ligament(s) without inhibiting knee mobility. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of one recently designed prophylactic knee brace and two neoprene knee sleeves upon performance of healthy athletes. Thirty-one healthy male athletes (age = 21.2 ± 1.5) volunteered as participants to examine the effect of prophylactic knee brace/sleeves on performance using isokinetic and functional tests. All subjects were tested in four conditions in a random order: 1. nonbraced (control) 2. using a neoprene knee sleeve 3. using a knee sleeve with four bilateral metal supports and 4. using a prophylactic knee brace. The study design was a crossover, randomized, controlled trial. Subjects completed single leg vertical jump, cross-over hop, and the isokinetic knee flexion and extension (at 60, 180, 300°/sec). Data were collected from the above tests and analyzed for jump height, cross-over hop distance, peak torque to body weight ratio and average power, respectively. Comparisons of these variables in the four testing conditions revealed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). The selected prophylactic brace/sleeves did not significantly inhibit athletic performance which might verify that their structure and design have caused no complication in the normal function of the knee joint. Moreover, it could be speculated that, if the brace or the sleeves had any limiting effect, our young healthy athletic subjects were well able to generate a mean peak torque large enough to overcome this possible restriction. Further studies are suggested to investigate the long term effect of these prophylactic knee brace and sleeves as well as their possible effect on the adjacent joints to the knee.